What sort of State are you in?

Not so much as a syllable from 'The European Parliament'. I'd say yet, but if they were for real - as in they genuinely were working to expose and ban the use of 'Wet Wear' - they'd be on it, wouldn't they?

I mean, c'mon; Western governments have set their stalls out on the back of championing 'Human Rights', or more broadly speaking, occupying the moral high ground. The fact that this' complete fallacy though, to date is of no real significance, because they refuse to even acknowledge claims made against them let alone entertain the legitimacy of those that are. The same applies to 'Human Rights Organisations' too, as on speaking with them, as soon as it's mentioned that claims are against Western governments they refuse to communicate further. Their purpose it seems is to highlight abuses occurring in other countries and parts of the world, but ignore any information relating to those occurring here – serious ones anyway. Stands to reason doesn't it that if an uninformed public here do begin to hear things being questioned, they'll automatically assume that what they're hearing can't be true if such organisations are 'pretending' to know nothing of it. Nothing is reported, so there must be nothing to report on, hey? I've read they're on the whole front groups, allowed to exist on the basis that they don't interfere in domestic issues deemed 'no go areas' and essentially then function bilaterally, as in they serve to both portray others in as poor a light as possible and by suppressing information relating to domestic abuses facilitate the believability of the whitewashing charade we're constantly bombarded with. I had a look over one their sites today and the harshest critique of a Western government I encountered – Guantanamo Bay aside – was concerning the American's and related to the lack of paid leave allocated to parents and how this has a detrimental effect on their children. Oh ... what horror! Surely, that the American government, amongst others, is responsible for implanting civilians with technology and targeting them with invisible microwave weaponry should mean greater billing than such – what is in comparison – trivial pug wash!? They say don't believe all you read, but this not only rings true its a direct reflection of what I've experienced and am continuing to.

What I'd really like to do is write moderately, positively even, concerning life and the way things be, seek to emphasise what is good and all we should embrace, rather than dwelling on and continually highlighting all the deception we're presented with and controlled by. Some would argue that what I do write amounts to sedition, treason even, and that in the not too distant past would have had my head removed from my shoulders for it. Well, without exaggerating to even the slightest degree I would have preferred the guillotine rather than having had to cope with all that I have been forced to over the course of my time thus far – it would have been far more humane. As stated previously too, I would be quite happy to attend court to face any charges along such lines brought against me, but this isn't likely to happen, because then I'd have the opportunity to present a case against the establishment order. One which would clearly show that they're not only operating illegally, but also in breach of every single one of 'The Universal Declaration of Human Rights'. Not exposure they'd welcome or even risk entertaining this! Indeed, why would they when what this represents falls nothing short too of them being deemed not fit to govern? Because in the eyes of any individual, let alone the laws of any land, if the truths concerning the crimes that are being perpetrated against innocent civilians, or even guilty ones for that matter, were to become known, then surely pressure could be brought to bear on the offending parties, they could be rooted out and imprisoned for crimes against humanity. I mean who are they other than a bunch of people that, based upon the fact they control wealth and occupy seats of influence, have 'assumed' the right to torture and murder others – and do so with impunity whilst they continue to openly lecture us on the crimes of others?

Wars have in fact been fought over much much lesser issues than what these people are categorically guilty of, and the real joke is that we elected them and will continue to do so, because, well, what realistic alternatives are we ever presented with? The face of governments may change in The West but the establishments remain, largely unhindered and unchecked.

There's little or NO difference between what Western governments are doing to civilians than what the Libyan authorities are doing openly right now to theirs, other than stealth. What we're dealing with, and will continue to have to on ever increasing levels if things don't change, is quite simply a high-tech version of just such oppression. It strikes me as a pretty sad state of affairs that we are governed by authorities which few believe and trust in, yet we're in turn expected to accept denials from them as gospel truths without any readily accessible means to question them. And this' civilisation!?

Well, knowing what I do, if I were a poor African or Asian, I'd be far more inclined towards lobbying my own government to provide more of life's basic essentials such as clean drinking water and agricultural supplies than I would be in encouraging them to invite Western governments in to help provide. I'd prefer to make do, live simply and not hanker for consumerism and technological progress. To do otherwise would be to actively usher in the enslavement of ones population – history tells this story and little has changed intrinsically, driven by greed they'll seek to dominate and control using any means at their disposal – if they believe they can get away with it, which seemingly they can and do.

The real shame is that it needn't be as it is; the specific problems don't lie within our societies as such, they lurk beyond and are contained within 'Secret Societies and Organisations' that seek to increase their control over all others with each generation that passes until complete dominance is achieved overall. These monsters do largely control our political and many large international corporate institutions. It's these bastards that need exposing and to then be held accountable for their heinous activities. World affairs are a complex issue, yes, but they needn't be near as much so as they are, if for instance the veil of secrecy under which governments are allowed to operate were lifted and transparency genuinely encouraged. Elected governments should be of and for the people, should represent and forward the will of their respective electorates. Fascism, given what we've learned from history, wouldn't get a serious look in at the polls if mainstream parties openly portrayed themselves as fascists. But what else are they if as they are doing, they allow and in doing so support the implanting of people with technology for means of control and torture via a real life technological Global Matrix, purpose built as the 'Final Solution' in a fascistic political agenda?

Who could argue, that from where I'm at, with my making the statement, “I am British and I live in a Fascist State”? Nobody could, effectively at any rate.

And what of The European Parliament?

'NO COMMENT' it would seem; which I'll interpret roughly as neither confirming nor denying the receipt of my e-mail, and charge too therefore, that they're pro-fascism as well.